Human Lives Human Rights: The Georgian Parliament made the first steps to approve the contentious bill “On transparency of foreign influence,” which is similar to last year’s widely contested and ultimately withdrawn “foreign agents” bill.
Responding to this, rights advocates call on the Georgian authorities to immediately stop their incessant efforts to impose repressive legislation on the country’s vibrant civil society. The proposed legislation poses a direct threat to the rights to freedom of association and expression, and for this reason it must not be adopted.
Similar legislation, all modeled on Russia’s infamous and highly repressive and stigmatizing “foreign agents” legislation, have been considered by countries across the post-Soviet region. The de facto authorities in Georgia’s breakaway region of Abkhazia have also announced plans to vote on a “foreign agents” law as part of their legislative efforts.
This latest attempt by the Georgian government to push through repressive legislation, while suppressing peaceful protests against it, must end now. Georgia’s international partners must not look away from this blatant effort to curb human rights in the country and the cynical attempts to impose overly restrictive legislation that would hinder the ability of people to defend human rights.
Background:
On 15 April 2024, the Georgian government’s Legal Committee endorsed the controversial bill “On transparency of foreign influence” — a legislation that compels civil society organizations with foreign funding to register as “organizations carrying out in the interests of a foreign power.” Consideration of the bill in the first reading was scheduled for the next day, and at the time of writing is still ongoing.
The same day, widespread peaceful protests erupted in Tbilisi with demonstrators waving Georgian and EU flags. The police response escalated quickly, resulting in 14 detentions for alleged public order offenses and a reported police injury.
Local civil society organizations have also raised concerns over reports of government officials threatening public servants and others to prevent them from speaking against the bill. Critics argue this bill could undermine Georgia’s EU accession ambitions by targeting civil society organizations and independent media, smearing them as “foreign agents” in a way that delegitimizes their work, and restricting their parliamentary access.
